Hi, Just a quick observation:
> basebackup.c's theory about relation truncation is that it doesn't > really matter because WAL replay will fix things up. But in this case, > I don't think it will, because WAL replay relies on the above > invariant holding. Assuming this is the case perhaps we can reduce the scenario and consider this simpler one: 1. The table is truncated 2. The DBMS is killed before making a checkpoint 3. We are in recovery and presumably see a pair of 0.5 Gb segments Or can't we? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev
