On 2023-Apr-18, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > While I'm certain that nobody will agree with me on every little > detail, I have to imagine that most would find my preferred ordering > quite understandable and unsurprising, at a high level -- this is not > a hopelessly idiosyncratic ranking, that could just as easily have > been generated by a PRNG. People may not easily agree that "apples are > more important than oranges, or vice-versa", but what does it matter? > I've really only put each option into buckets of items with *roughly* > the same importance. All of the details beyond that don't matter to > me, at all.
I agree with you that roughly bucketing items is a good approach. Within each bucket we can then sort alphabetically. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "If you have nothing to say, maybe you need just the right tool to help you not say it." (New York Times, about Microsoft PowerPoint)
