Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 12:06 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Hmm, you're right: I checked the POSIX.1-2018 spec as well, and >> it agrees that the prefix field is 155 bytes long. Perhaps just >> add another comment line indicating that 12 bytes remain unassigned? > > OK. Here's v2, with that change and a few others.
It still has magic numbers for the sizes of the fields, should those also be named constants? - ilmari
