On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Gilman <davidgilm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The SQL Language part of the docs has a brief page on unique indexes. > It doesn't mention the new NULLS NOT DISTINCT functionality on unique > indexes and this is a good place to mention it, as it already warns > the user about the old/default behavior. > > I'm ok with the wording as-is, but perhaps we can phrase it as "distinct" vs "not equal", thus leaning into the syntax a bit: By default, null values in a unique column are considered distinct, allowing multiple nulls in the column. or maybe By default, null values in a unique column are considered <literal>DISTINCT</literal>, allowing multiple nulls in the column.
