>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> I'm +1 for backpatching it. It may be operating as designed by >> PeterE ten years ago, but it's not operating as designed by the SQL >> standard. Tom> By that argument, *anyplace* where we're missing a SQL-spec Tom> feature is a back-patchable bug. I don't buy it. But this is a feature we already claimed to actually support (it's listed in sql_features with a bunch of unqualified YES entries), but in fact doesn't work properly. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
