> On 14 Apr 2023, at 16:20, Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote:
> 
>> On 14 Apr 2023, at 15:51, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> 
>> Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes:
>>> I mainly put save_errno back into SOCK_ERRNO for greppability, I don't have 
>>> any
>>> strong opinions either way so I went with the latter suggestion.  Attached 
>>> v3
>>> does the above change and passes the tests both with a broken and working
>>> system CA pool.  Unless objections from those with failing local envs I 
>>> propose
>>> this is pushed to close the open item.
>> 
>> One more question when looking at it with fresh eyes: should the argument
>> of X509_verify_cert_error_string be "ecode" or "vcode"?
> 
> Good catch, it should be vcode.

And again with the attachment.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Attachment: libpq_system_ca_fix_v4.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to