Hi Andrew,
> I don't think we can protect against all possible user names. Wouldn't it be
> better to run the tests under an OS user with a different name, like
> "marmaduke"? ("user" is a truly terrible default user name).
100% agree. The point is not to protect against all possible user
names but merely to reduce the likelihood of the problem. For this
particular test there is no difference which keyword to use for the
test. I realize this is a minor problem, however the fix is trivial
too.
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
