Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> IOW, maybe it'd be okay to de-revert 3d4fa227b and add documentation
>> saying that --with-gssapi requires MIT Kerberos not Heimdal.

> I'd be happy with that and can add the appropriate documentation noting
> that we require MIT Kerberos.  Presumably the appropriate step at this
> point would be to check with the RMT?

Yeah, RMT would have final say at this stage.

If you pull the trigger, a note to buildfarm-members would be
appropriate too, so people will know if they need to remove
--with-gssapi from animal configurations.

                        regards, tom lane


Reply via email to