Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> IOW, maybe it'd be okay to de-revert 3d4fa227b and add documentation >> saying that --with-gssapi requires MIT Kerberos not Heimdal.
> I'd be happy with that and can add the appropriate documentation noting > that we require MIT Kerberos. Presumably the appropriate step at this > point would be to check with the RMT? Yeah, RMT would have final say at this stage. If you pull the trigger, a note to buildfarm-members would be appropriate too, so people will know if they need to remove --with-gssapi from animal configurations. regards, tom lane