Hi, On 2023-04-07 17:19:42 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > I think > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=drongo&dt=2023-04-07%2021%3A16%3A04 > might point out a problem with the pg_dump or pg_upgrade backward compat > paths: > > --- C:\\prog\\bf/root/upgrade.drongo/HEAD/origin-REL9_5_STABLE.sql.fixed > 2023-04-07 23:51:27.641328600 +0000 > +++ > C:\\prog\\bf/root/upgrade.drongo/HEAD/converted-REL9_5_STABLE-to-HEAD.sql.fixed > 2023-04-07 23:51:27.672571900 +0000 > @@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ > -- Name: entry; Type: TABLE; Schema: public; Owner: buildfarm > -- > CREATE TABLE public.entry ( > - accession text, > - eid integer, > - txid smallint > + accession text NOT NULL, > + eid integer NOT NULL, > + txid smallint NOT NULL > ); > ALTER TABLE public.entry OWNER TO buildfarm; > -- > > Looks like we're making up NOT NULL constraints when migrating from 9.5, for > some reason?
My compiler complains: ../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/catalog/heap.c: In function ‘AddRelationNotNullConstraints’: ../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/catalog/heap.c:2829:37: warning: ‘conname’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 2829 | if (strcmp(lfirst(lc2), conname) == 0) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../../../../home/andres/src/postgresql/src/backend/catalog/heap.c:2802:29: note: ‘conname’ was declared here 2802 | char *conname; | ^~~~~~~ I think the compiler may be right - I think the first use of conname might have been intended as constr->conname? Greetings, Andres Freund