On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.ba...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > The second would mean that SELECT * from foreign table reports > remotetableoid as well, which is awkward.
No it wouldn't. You'd just make the additional column resjunk, same as we do for wholerow. > Anyway, my comment to which you have replied is obsolete now. I found > a solution to that problem, which I have implemented in 0003 in the > latest patch-set I have shared. Yeah, but I'm not sure I like that solution very much. I don't think abusing the tableoid to store a remote table OID is very nice. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
