> On 30 Mar 2023, at 08:24, Peter Eisentraut 
> <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> 
> The pg_basebackup code has WalSegSz as uint32, whereas the rest of the code 
> has it as int.  This seems confusing, and using the extra range wouldn't 
> actually work.  This was in the original commit (fc49e24fa6), but I suppose 
> it was an oversight.

LGTM, it indeed seems to be an accidental oversight.

--
Daniel Gustafsson



Reply via email to