> On 19 Mar 2023, at 23:41, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 12:19:56PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: >> Rebased to latest Head. > > I was looking at this thread, and echoing Daniel's and Alvaro's > arguments, I don't quite see why this patch is something we need. I > would recommend to mark it as rejected and move on.
Unless the claimed performance improvement is measured and provides a speedup, and the loss of zeroing memory is guaranteed safe, there doesn't seem to be much value provided. -- Daniel Gustafsson
