On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 2:00 PM houzj.f...@fujitsu.com <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > I noticed that there are some duplicated codes in pgoutput_change() function > which can be simplified, and here is an attempt to do that. >
For REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_DELETE, when the old tuple is missing, after this patch, we will still send BEGIN and do OutputPluginWrite, etc. Also, it will try to perform row_filter when none of old_slot or new_slot is set. I don't know for which particular case we have s handling missing old tuples for deletes but that might require changes in your proposed patch. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
