On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, 12:36 Michael Paquier, <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 09:13:46AM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > > It's problematic to install the extension if we rely on upgrade scripts > only. > > We could also provide a pg_walinspect--1.2.sql file and it would just > work, and > > that may have been a good idea if there wasn't also the problem of > people still > > having the version 1.1 locally installed, as we don't want them to see > random > > failures like "could not find function ... in file ...", or keeping the > ability > > to install the former 1.1 version (with those functions bypassed). > > Why would we need a 1.2? HEAD is the only branch with pg_walinspect > 1.1, and it has not been released yet. > ah right I should have checked. but the same ABI compatibility concern still exists for version 1.0 of the extension. >
