Dear Amit, > Fair point but I think the current comment should explain why we are > doing something different here. How about extending the existing > comments to something like: "If we've requested to shut down, exit the > process. This is unlike handling at other places where we allow > complete WAL to be sent before shutdown because we don't want the > delayed transactions to be applied downstream. This will allow one to > use the data from downstream in case of some unwanted operations on > the current node."
Thank you for suggestion. I think it is better, so changed. Please see new patch at [1] [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/TYAPR01MB586606CF3B585B6F8BE13A9CF5B29%40TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com Best Regards, Hayato Kuroda FUJITSU LIMITED
