On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:01 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Most of the multiplexed SIGUSR1 handlers are setting latch explicitly > when the procsignal_sigusr1_handler() can do that for them at the end. > These multiplexed handlers are currently being used as SIGUSR1 > handlers, not as independent handlers, so no problem if SetLatch() is > removed from them. A few others do it right by saying /* latch will be > set by procsignal_sigusr1_handler */. Although, calling SetLatch() in > quick succession does no harm (it just returns if the latch was > previously set), it seems unnecessary. > +1
-- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh
