Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> writes: > Specifying the GUCs in question is a good idea, done in the attached. I'm not > sure the phrasing is spot-on though, but I can't think of a better one. If > you > can think of a better one I'm all ears.
I'd just change "the definition of" to "the definitions of".
LGTM otherwise.
regards, tom lane
