Uggg!

At Mon, 27 Feb 2023 17:48:10 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi 
<horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote in 
> At Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:20:39 +0900, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> 
> wrote in 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > While doing something I should not have done, I have been able to
> > trigger latch.c with the error of $subject.  Adding in the elog
> > generated some information about the PID owning the latch and
> > MyProcPid has made me understand immediately why I was wrong.  Would
> > there be any objections to add more information in this case?
> > 
> > The attached patch does so.
> > Thanks,
> 
> Please tidy up the followging sentence properly and natural but in a 
> moderately formal  way, within the context of computer programs, and provide 
> explanations for the individual changes you made.

Please ignore the following sentense. It is an extra sentence
mistakenly copy-pasted in.

> +1 for adding that information, I'm afraid that MyProcId is not
> necessary since it is displayed in log lines in most cases.  If you
> want to display the both PIDs I suggest making them more distinctive.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


Reply via email to