On Wed, 2023-02-22 at 09:27 -0800, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Another option is to execute under the intersection of their
> privileges, where both the definer and the invoker need the
> privileges in order for the action to succeed. That would be more
> permissive than the proposed SECURITY NONE, while still preventing
> either party from hijacking privileges of the other.
Interesting idea, I haven't heard of something like that being done
before. Is there some precedent for that or a use case where it's
helpful?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
