On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 at 23:23, Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> I rebased, but there are no code differences.
>

The patch set seem to be in a good shape and pretty stable for quite a
while.
Could you add one more minor improvement, a new line after variables
declaration?

+               int             exit_code =
wait_result_to_exit_code(result);
+               char    buf[32];
...here
+               snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%d", exit_code);
+               SetVariable(pset.vars, "SHELL_EXIT_CODE", buf);
+               SetVariable(pset.vars, "SHELL_ERROR", "true");

+               char    exit_code_buf[32];
... and here
+               snprintf(exit_code_buf, sizeof(exit_code_buf), "%d",
+                                wait_result_to_exit_code(exit_code));
+               SetVariable(pset.vars, "SHELL_EXIT_CODE", exit_code_buf);
+               SetVariable(pset.vars, "SHELL_ERROR", "true");

After this changes, I think, we make this patch RfC, shall we?

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Orlov.

Reply via email to