On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 7:50 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fuj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure this is a good idea, because the epq_path will return at > most one tuple in an EPQ recheck. > > The reason why an extra Sort node is injected into the epq_path is > only label it with the correct sort order to use it as an input for > the EPQ merge-join path of a higher-level foreign join, so shouldn't > we keep this step as much as simple and save cycles even a little? Agreed. Thanks for the explanation. I also wondered whether it's worthwhile to do the change here. I'll remove the 0001 patch. Thanks Richard
