On 2018-05-11 14:56:12 +0200, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 11 May 2018 at 05:32, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > No. Simon just claimed it's not actually a concern: > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/canp8+j+vtskphep_gmqmeqdwakst2kbotee0yz-my+agh0a...@mail.gmail.com > > > > And yes, it got committed without doing squat to address the > > architectural concerns. > > "Squat" means "zero, nothing" to me. So that comment would be inaccurate.
Yes, I know it means that. And I don't see how it is inaccurate. > I have no problem if you want to replace this with an even better > design in a later release. Meh. The author / committer should get a patch into the right shape, not other people that are concerned with the consequences. Greetings, Andres Freund
