On 2023-Feb-16, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 2/16/23 12:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I don't think this is the fault of logical replication. Consider that > > for the backend server, the function source code is just an opaque > > string that is given to the plpgsql engine to interpret. So there's no > > way for the logical DDL replication engine to turn this into runnable > > code if the table name is not qualified. > > Sure, that's fair. That said, the example above would fall under a "typical > use case", i.e. I'm replicating functions that call tables without schema > qualification. This is pretty common, and as logical replication becomes > used for more types of workloads (e.g. high availability), we'll definitely > see this. Hmm, I think you're saying that replay should turn check_function_bodies off, and I think I agree with that. -- Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "El hombre nunca sabe de lo que es capaz hasta que lo intenta" (C. Dickens)
