On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 12:11 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:26:55PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > So, if I am understanding this stuff right, this issue can create data
> > corruption once a DDL updates any pages of pg_class stored in a
> > template database that gets copied by this routine. In this case, the
> > patch sent makes sure that any page copied will get written once a
> > checkpoint kicks in. Shouldn't we have at least a regression test for
> > such a scenario? The issue can happen when updating a template
> > database after creating a database from it, which is less worrying
> > than the initial impression I got, still I'd like to think that we
> > should have some coverage as of the special logic this code path
> > relies on for pg_class when reading its buffers.
>
> I was able to quickly hack together a TAP test that seems to reliably fail
> before the fix and pass afterwards. There's probably a better place for
> it, though...
I think the below change is not relevant to this bug right?
diff --git a/src/test/recovery/meson.build b/src/test/recovery/meson.build
index 209118a639..6e9f8a7c7f 100644
--- a/src/test/recovery/meson.build
+++ b/src/test/recovery/meson.build
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ tests += {
't/031_recovery_conflict.pl',
't/032_relfilenode_reuse.pl',
't/033_replay_tsp_drops.pl',
+ 't/100_bugs.pl',
],
},
}
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
