At Mon, 13 Feb 2023 08:27:01 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote in > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 7:26 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > IMHO I vaguely don't like that we lose a means to specify the default > > behavior here. And I'm not sure we definitely don't need other than > > flush and immedaite for both physical and logical replication. > > > > If we can think of any use case that requires its extension then it > makes sense to make it a non-boolean option but otherwise, let's keep > things simple by having a boolean option.
What do you think about the need for explicitly specifying the default? I'm fine with specifying the default using a single word, such as WAIT_FOR_REMOTE_FLUSH. > > If it's > > not the case, I don't object to make it a Boolean. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
