Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-02-10 15:57:50 -0800, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> From my POV v7 is especially needed for users. Current standard status
>> is "draft". And I'm not sure it will be accepted before our feature
>> freeze for PG16. Maybe we could provide a draft implementation in 16
>> and adjust it to the accepted version if the standard is changed? PFA
>> patch with implementation.
> Hm. It seems somewhat worrisome to claim something is a v7 UUID when it might
> turn out to not be one.
I think there is no need to rush this into v16. Let's wait for the
standardization process to play out.
regards, tom lane
