On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 5:09 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > I do like the ICU format locale IDs from a readability standpoint. > "en_US@colstrength=primary" is more meaningful to me than "en-US-u-ks- > level1" (the equivalent language tag).
Sadly, neither of those means a whole lot to me? :-( How did you find out that those are equivalent? > And the format is specified[1], > even though it's not an independent standard. But I think the benefits > of better validation, an independent standard, and the fact that we're > already favoring BCP47 outweigh my subjective opinion. See, I'm confused, because that link says "If a keyword list is present it must be preceded by an at-sign" which makes it sound like it is talking about stuff like en_US@colstrength=primary rather than stuff like en-US-u-ks-level1. The examples are all that way too, like it gives examples like en_IE@currency=IEP and fr@collation=phonebook;calendar=islamic-civil. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
