Hi, On 2023-02-09 17:19:22 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > The trivial fix of using MAXPGPATH made it build, without warnings. That > > doesn't say anything about actually working. So I guess porting the test > > would > > make sense. > > > Opinions on whether it would make sense as a shell script? > > Hmmm .. a shell script would be fine by me, but it won't help in > testing a Windows build. Maybe we need to make it a Perl script?
At least for casual testing a shell script actually mostly works, due to git it's easy enough to have a sh.exe around... Not something I'd necessarily want to make a hard dependency, but for something like this it might suffice. Of course perl would be more dependable... > BTW, the attachments to your previous message are identical to what > I previously posted --- did you attach the wrong set of diffs? I attached an extra patch, in addition to yours. I also attached yours so that cfbot could continue to work, if you registered this. Greetings, Andres Freund
