Hi, On February 9, 2023 2:50:57 AM PST, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksan...@timescale.com> wrote: >Hi Andres, > >> > So to clarify, are we talking about tuple-level compression? Or >> > perhaps page-level compression? >> >> Tuple level. > >> although my own patch proposed attribute-level compression, not >> tuple-level one, it is arguably closer to tuple-level approach than >> page-level one > >Just wanted to make sure that by tuple-level we mean the same thing. > >When saying tuple-level do you mean that the entire tuple should be >compressed as one large binary (i.e. similarly to page-level >compression but more granularly), or every single attribute should be >compressed separately (similarly to how TOAST does this)?
Good point - should have been clearer. I meant attribute wise compression. Like we do today, except that we would use a dictionary to increase compression rates. Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
