Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I'm writing my own patch for this problem. While playing around with
> it, I noticed this:
> struct Command {
> /* size: 2168, cachelines: 34, members: 11 */
> /* sum members: 2164, holes: 1, sum holes: 4 */
> /* last cacheline: 56 bytes */
> };
I think the original intent was for argv[] to be at the end,
which fell victim to ye olde add-at-the-end antipattern.
Cache-friendliness-wise, putting it back to the end would
likely be enough. But turning it into a variable-size array
would be better from a functionality standpoint.
regards, tom lane
