On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > The reason why I think the current behavior is okay because it is > coincidental that they were displayed correctly. We have not made any > effort to percolate it to upper nodes. For ex., before that commit > also, it was not being displayed for Gather Merge or Gather with some > kind of node like 'Limit' where we have to stop before reaching the > end of the result.
It's not entirely coincidental. I had the intention to try to ensure that the workers would be shut down before the Gather or Gather Merge, and I think that various things in the code testify to that intention. It sounds like I missed some cases, but now we're missing even more cases. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
