On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 at 15:55, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > > On 13.01.23 11:01, Dean Rasheed wrote: > > So I'm feeling quite good about the end result -- I set out hoping not > > to make performance noticeably worse, but ended up making it > > significantly better. > > This is great! How do you want to proceed? You also posted an updated > patch in the "underscores" thread and suggested some additional work > there. In which order should these be addressed, in your opinion? >
I think it makes most sense if I push 0001 now, and then merge 0002 into the underscores patch. I think at least one of the suggested changes to the underscores patch required 0002 to work. Regards, Dean
