sirisha chamarthi <sirichamarth...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:59 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> In short, the proposed fix alone seems fine to me. If we want to show
>> further details, I would add a bit as follows.
>>
>> | * * WALAVAIL_REMOVED means it has been removed. A replication stream on
>> | * a slot with this LSN cannot continue. Note that the affected
>> | * processes have been terminated by checkpointer, too.
> Thanks for your comments! Attached the patch with your suggestions.
Pushed with a bit of additional wordsmithing. I thought "have been"
was a bit too strong of an assertion considering that this function
does not pay any attention to the actual state of any processes,
so I made it say "should have been".
regards, tom lane
