Hi, On 2023-01-19 13:36:41 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:58 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > There's absolutely no guarantee that autoanalyze is triggered > > there. Particularly with repeated vacuums triggered due to an relfrozenxid > > age > > that can't be advanced that very well might not happen within days on a > > large > > relation. > > Arguments like that work far better as arguments in favor of the > vac_estimate_reltuples heuristics.
I don't agree. But mainly my issue is that the devil you know (how this has worked for a while) is preferrable to introducing an unknown quantity (your patch that hasn't yet seen real world exposure). Greetings, Andres Freund
