On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 05:22, Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:29:25PM +0530, vignesh C wrote: > > I too felt keeping it simpler is better. How about using the simple > > first version of patch itself? > > Okay, I have just done that, then, after checking that all the object > types were covered (28). Note that PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE has been > removed for simplicity.
Thanks for pushing this. Regards, Vignesh
