Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:18 AM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> I don't like that - it's also quite useful to disable use of ringbuffers when
>> you actually need to clean up indexes. Especially when we have a lot of dead
>> tuples we'll rescan indexes over and over...
> That's a fair point.
> My vote goes to "REUSE_BUFFERS", then.
I wonder whether it could make sense to allow a larger ringbuffer size,
rather than just the limit cases of "on" and "off".
regards, tom lane
