On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 11:18:59AM +0000, Dean Rasheed wrote: > It might be true that temp tables aren't usually interesting from a > permissions point of view, but it's not hard to imagine situations > where interesting things do happen. It's also probably the case that > most users won't have many temp tables, so I don't think including > them by default will be particularly intrusive. > > Also, from a user perspective, I think it would be something of a POLA > violation for \dp[S] and \dt[S] to include different sets of tables, > though I appreciate that we do that now. There's nothing in the docs > to indicate that that's the case.
Agreed. > Anyway, I've pushed the v2 patch as-is. If anyone feels strongly > enough that we should change its behaviour for temp tables, then we > can still discuss that. Thanks! -- Nathan Bossart Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
