Thanks for the reply. > Thanks for reporting. I think for LogicalParallelApplyStateChange we'd better > document it in a consistent style with LogicalSyncStateChange, > so I have slightly adjusted the patch for the same.
I think the description in the patch you attached is better. Regards, Noriyoshi Shinoda -----Original Message----- From: houzj.f...@fujitsu.com <houzj.f...@fujitsu.com> Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 7:15 PM To: Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shin...@hpe.com>; Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com>; wangw.f...@fujitsu.com; Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com>; shiy.f...@fujitsu.com; PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>; Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply On Monday, January 9, 2023 5:32 PM Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP) <noriyoshi.shin...@hpe.com> wrote: > > Hi, Thanks for the great new feature. > > Applied patches include adding wait events LogicalParallelApplyMain, > LogicalParallelApplyStateChange. > However, it seems that monitoring.sgml only contains descriptions for > pg_locks. The attached patch adds relevant wait event information. > Please update if you have a better description. Thanks for reporting. I think for LogicalParallelApplyStateChange we'd better document it in a consistent style with LogicalSyncStateChange, so I have slightly adjusted the patch for the same. Best regards, Hou zj
