Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com> writes: > I'm going to push this and backpatch to all supported versions if no > objections.
Push yes, but I'd counsel against back-patching. People don't generally like unexpected plan changes in stable versions, and that's what a costing change could produce. There's no argument that we are fixing a failure or wrong answer here, so it doesn't seem like back-patch material. regards, tom lane