On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 9:00 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:46 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Agreed. Attached the updated patch. > > > > Thanks, the patch looks good to me. I think it would be probably good > to backpatch this but it has the potential to break some monitoring > scripts which were using the wrong columns for transaction id and spec > token number.
Right. > As this is not a very critical issue and is not reported > till now, so it may be better to leave backpatching it. What do you > think? Considering the compatibility, I'm inclined to agree not to backpatch it. If someone complains about the current behavior in back branches in the future, we can backpatch it. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
