Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> writes:
> I've been wondering if it might be a good idea to have a third parameter
> for pg_input_error_message() which would default to false, but which if
> true would cause it to emit the detail and hint fields, if any, as well
> as the message field from the error_data.
I don't think that just concatenating those strings would make for a
pleasant API. More sensible, perhaps, to have a separate function
that returns a record. Or we could redefine the existing function
that way, but I suspect that "just the primary error" will be a
principal use-case.
Being able to get the SQLSTATE is likely to be interesting too.
regards, tom lane
