Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-12-27 01:55:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A couple of buildfarm animals are warning about that too ... but
>> only a couple.
> I'm a bit confused by gcc getting confused here - the condition for
> sub_rteperminfos getting initialized and used are the same. Most of the time
> the maybe-uninitialized logic seems to be better than this.
Apparently the key phrase there is "most of the time" ;-).
I see that we've had an equally "unnecessary" initialization of the
sibling variable sub_rtable for a long time, so the problem's been
there for some people before. I made it initialize sub_rteperminfos
the same way.
regards, tom lane
