Em qui., 22 de dez. de 2022 às 15:45, Nikita Malakhov <huku...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hi, > > Actually, there would be much more sources affected, like > nbytes += subbytes[outer_nelems]; > subnitems[outer_nelems] = ArrayGetNItems(this_ndims, > ARR_DIMS(array)); > nitems += subnitems[outer_nelems]; > havenulls |= ARR_HASNULL(array); > outer_nelems++; > } > > Maybe it is better for most calls like this to keep old behavior, by > passing a flag > that says which behavior is expected by caller? > I agreed that it is better to keep old behavior. Even the value 0 is problematic, with calls like this: nel = ARRNELEMS(ent); memcpy(ptr, ARRPTR(ent), nel * sizeof(int32)); regards, Ranier Vilela
