čt 15. 12. 2022 v 8:53 odesílatel Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com>
napsal:

> At Thu, 15 Dec 2022 08:41:21 +0100, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com>
> wrote in
> > čt 15. 12. 2022 v 8:25 odesílatel Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com
> >
> > napsal:
> > > Is this a bug in plpgsql?
> > >
> >
> > I think it is by design.  There is not any callback that is called after
> an
> > exception.
> >
> > It is true, so some callbacks on statement error and function's error can
> > be nice. It can help me to implement profilers, or tracers more simply
> and
> > more robustly.
> >
> > But I am not sure about performance impacts. This is on a critical path.
>
> I didn't searched for, but I guess all of the end-side callback of all
> begin-end type callbacks are not called on exception. Additional
> PG_TRY level wouldn't be acceptable for performance reasons.
>
> What we (pg_hint_plan people) want is any means to know that the
> top-level function is exited, to reset function nest level. It would
> be simpler than calling end callback at every nest level.
>
>
I found some solution based by using fmgr hook

https://github.com/okbob/plpgsql_check/commit/9a17e97354a48913de5219048ee3be6f8460bae9

regards

Pavel


regards.
>
> --
> Kyotaro Horiguchi
> NTT Open Source Software Center
>

Reply via email to