On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 9:28 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 11:55 AM shiy.f...@fujitsu.com > <shiy.f...@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 6:57 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 3:41 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > I think we need something like this[1] so that we can better control > > > > the streaming. > > > > > > > > > > +1. The additional advantage would be that we can generate parallel > > > apply and new streaming tests with much lesser data. Shi-San, can you > > > please start a new thread for the GUC patch proposed by you as > > > indicated by Dilip? > > > > > > > OK, I started a new thread for it. [1] > > > > Thanks. I think it is better to go ahead with this patch and once we > decide what is the right thing to do in terms of GUC then we can try > to add additional tests for this. Anyway, it is not that the code > added by this patch is not getting covered by existing tests. What do > you think?
That makes sense to me. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
