On 2022-12-05 Mo 14:22, Corey Huinker wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:36 AM Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> > wrote: > > > On 2022-12-05 Mo 11:20, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 11:09 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 10:57 PM Corey Huinker > <corey.huin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> 2. ereturn_* => errfeedback / error_feedback / feedback > >>> Oh, I like that, especially errfeedback. > >> efeedback? But TBH I do not think any of these are better than > ereturn. > > I do. Having a macro name that is "return" plus one character is > going > > to make people think that it returns. I predict that if you > insist on > > using that name people are still going to be making mistakes > based on > > that confusion 10 years from now. > > > > OK, I take both this point and Tom's about trying to keep it the same > length. So we need something that's 7 letters, doesn't say > 'return' and > preferably begins with 'e'. I modestly suggest 'eseterr', or if we > like > the 'feedback' idea 'efeedbk'. > > > > Consulting https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/feedback again: > ereply clocks in at 7 characters.
It does? cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
