Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > My own effort was getting bogged down in the number of changes I needed to > make in code paths that would never want a failover case for their > typecasts, so I'm going to refactor my work on top of this and see where I > get stuck.
+1, that would be a good way to see if I missed anything.
regards, tom lane
