On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:59 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > You can prepare a patch, but it unlikely to get much interest until you > get agreement on what the behavior should be.
We discussed the approach on 2020's Unconference [0]. And there kind of was an agreement. Then I made a presentation on FOSDEM with all the details [1]. The patch had been on commitfest since 2019 [2]. There were reviewers in the CF entry, and we kind of had an agreement. Jeff Davis proposed a similar patch [3]. And we certainly agreed about cancels. And now Bharath is proposing the same. We have the interest and agreement. Best regards, Andrey Borodin. [0] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2020_Developer_Unconference/Edge_cases_of_synchronous_replication_in_HA_solutions [1] https://archive.fosdem.org/2021/schedule/event/postgresql_caveats_of_replication/attachments/slides/4365/export/events/attachments/postgresql_caveats_of_replication/slides/4365/sides.pdf [2] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/26/2402/ [3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6a052e81060824a8286148b1165bafedbd7c86cd.camel%40j-davis.com#415dc2f7d41b8a251b419256407bb64d
