On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 08:49:24AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > In line of ad96696, seems like that it would make sense to do the same > here even if the bar is lower. sepgsql has not changed in years, so I > suspect few conflicts. Alvaro, if you want to take care of that, > that's fine by me. I could do it, but not before next week.
I got to look at that, now that the minor releases have been tagged, and the change has no conflicts down to 9.3. 9.2 needed a slight tweak, though, but it seemed fine as well. (Tested the build on all branches.) So done all the way down, sticking with the new no-warning policy for all the buildable branches. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
