On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 01:16:09PM -0600, Jason Petersen wrote: > So the tooling around people using it is there and it’s used by some > very large and mature projects covering a variety of domains: I don’t > know if it’s “poorly supported” (the documentation leaves something to > be desired), but if CMake has trouble down the line a lot of very > important projects will be in trouble. It seems like a pretty safe bet > given the sheer inertia of the list above.
Yes, those would be arguments pushing in favor of cmake. Yuriy has mentioned me a couple of times that when he worked on the cmake integration on Windows he used heavily VS because that was quite friendly on Windows and their was a good integration work. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
